Monthly Archives: July 2007 - Page 2

SMX Sweden draws closer

The SES that I was a part of in 2005 did not impress me and I have never seen such a small expo for such a well known event in my life. I am hoping that Scandinavians will flock to the SMX this year, at least to show Chris Sherman and friends support because of their efforts to try again and of course to learn from it.

The conferences will be conducted by US search engine marketing (SEM) experts Chris Sherman and Danny Sullivan and if I know them a team of international experts on search marketing. I know I will be there and look forward visiting again one of the most beutifull cities in Europe, Stockholm. You can find more about the SMX and other Search Engine related confrences at www.emarketing.is.

The 20, 40, 40 rule

I am often asked how we can take the technology aspect away from Internet Marketing. From my point of view the simplest way of explaining how it works is the 20 – 40 – 40 rule. I am not sure who came up with first but it’s a simple way of explaining the factors that influence marketing on the Internet. 20 stands for that technology has 20% impact on success, 40 stands for that on-site stuff has 40% effect and finally that off-site stuff such as link popularity and bookmarking has the final 40%. So if we have the 20%, the foundation ok, the tech part is out of the way and we can focus on the rest.

Here is a good link in regards of this – Holistic Internet Marketing Approach

Music on the Internet

The impact that the internet has had on the music industry is huge, both good and bad. One of the good impacts are the distribution possibilities of small bands with little to none budget for marketing. Especially when using sites like MySpace and we have heard of bands being signed up after agents have heard them through the Internet.

Another sample is close to us, the www.icelandicmusic.is – a one stop resource on music from Iceland, such as Björk, Ampop, Sigur Rós and Mum to mention few. I am going to have a close eye on that site being a guitar player myself.

Power to the People; are we moving beyond Page Rank?

“A social search engine is a type of search engine that determines the relevance of search results by considering the interactions or contributions of users. Example forms of user input include social bookmarking or direct interaction with the search results such as promoting or demoting results the user feels are more or less relevant to their query.”

Not so long ago Google’s Page Rank changed the face of Internet search as we knew it, the likes of Yahoo, Ask and AltaVista all lost out as the age of Google began. But now that we’ve just got to grips with page rank, the basic principles of Social Search threaten to undermine and change our online marketing strategies.  But is it really that simple? And what is Google besides a social search engine when it relies on the collective opinions of webmasters and editors who judge other sites?The idea behind social search, also referred to as community search or behavioural targeted search, is that online communities and users enter data into search results which then directly affect them, thus changing search as we know it and shifting the power to the people.

I have few basic questions on this matter

What are the pros and cons of social search, such as the potential increased importance of search results, the problems of search and link spam and the possibility of a drop in importance of long-tail searches?

Can this potential ‘revolution’ in search change the Internet forever? How can marketeers start identifying audiences according to online behaviour and target specific groups directly using Social search? And finally will the search engine landscape change overnight and ask ourselves how worried we really need to be!

Web 2.0 – The Internet is evolving, ain’t it?

I am not sure we can say that the latest Jargon in the world of the Internet is “Web 2.0″, because it’s getting to be old news, but here are my basic thoughts on the topic. While every evolution of software seams to have a evolving number the Internet has stayed the same. Windows Office has gone from 95 to 2003 (2006) and my favored videogame has gone through at least five stages. So why has the Internet not?

Well some say it has and some say it’s still evolving and has not left 1.0, is at most around 1.005. But those who do say it has evolved say it’s now at version 2.0. So what is different? Though this is more based on subjectivity than anything else, it might be worth thinking about, is the Internet evolving and how?