Just came from Search engine Strategies London and did a great seasion on CMS’s with Mike Grehan moderation. With me there was my Dansih friend Mikkel deMib and with us we had the Fantomaster him self Ralph Tegtmeier. the conference it self was from my point of view great success, would have wanted to see more people but both Mike Grehan and Kevin Ryan did a great job on organising the event and choosing the speakers. Great job but I must say that I did miss my dear friends Chris Sherman and Shari Thurow.
With this conference finished there are two down and three to go before this summer, DNA 2008 in Brussels where I am chairing, the SES in NY where I am talking about Managing PPC for Multiple Clients. In May I am speaking at the International Search Summit in London (at the British Library).
Lot’s of travels, great fun and hopefully some business
Well if they have a no-follow on them then they are no good for SEO/SEM. But should you be getting links only becuase of your SEO efforts? The short answer is no, you should be getting you links because of you content from sites that alsi have content related to yours, those links are worth their weight in gold (how much does a link weigh?). Good content is also great when it comes to link baiting, that is getting sites to link to you because you have great information on your site.
This is how ever a catch 22, meaning that you need links to exist at Google, it’s a little like getting a new phone number and nobody calls becuase nobody knows your new number, but as soon as the word spreds your phone won’t stop.
So who is the ideal link partner? First stop would be the same web sites linking to your competitor, next stop would be searching for link pages related to your sector, you might want to search for “travel links” or “post travel links” if you are a travel site, then you might want to narrow it down if you are a hotel to hotel links and so on.
But all of this does not answer the question, how important are inbound links? They are important and from where we stand they are about 40% (even more) of the total organic result factor of your favorite search engine. Of the three catagories of links you can have for your self they are around 70%, with the two other internal and outbound links sharing the remining 30%.
For those not sure Internal links refers to the number of links coming from within your site. There has been some debate on how important those links are, but we have found that they can play a major role when trying to get your site seen.
If you want to make internal links work for you, firt make sure that you cross link your important related pages and have a good sitemap for the crawlers to see and better yet crawl. Do NOT use the No-Follow on you internal links, exept if it is a part of some thought out strategy.
Don’t use such text links as “read more” or “click here” use meaningful phrases that reflect the content you are pointing to, don’t over do it.
Internal links do nly boost link popularity and increase the visibility of your whole website. Have this in mind when you design you site.
Other type of links would be, incoming links and outgoing links and we will write about them later.
Argh! I can’t stop… Dear Google, you must pardon my mirth! I’m really your biggest fan. According to the attached image, which graced my eye when I pushed the offending button you have actually gone and TRADEMARKED the spelling error! Mi oh mi can this get any better?
One of the characteristics of the tiny (300k) nation of Iceland is the pride we take in our language. Bill Gates recognized this when he decided to translate Windows to Icelandic and of course Google offers its well loved search window in our beautiful language. Well it sent shivers down my spine to see that they would allow a spelling error of considerable magnitude. The english equivalent would be “Englysh”.
However I’m afraid only my fellow Icelanders will appreciate the full visual effect… But here goes… Click here and prepare to shudder in dismay >>>
Andy Atkins Kruger feels that Microsoft should drop the Yahoo deal “there’s no global benefit!”. But what does it mean? This post at Multilingual Search on the global effect of the Yahoo/Microsoft deal is one of the longest blog-posts I have seen, but however gives an in-depth answer into the real impact of all of this. The final verdict is “Drop Yahoo deal Microsoft, there’s no global benefit!”.
But why is that? Andy thinks it’s short and sweet “it seems like a deal driven by US egos”.
Great post Andy!