<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Optimize Your Web &#187; Katya</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/author/katya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com</link>
	<description>Web optimization will never be the same!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should one get into Google&#8217;s real-time results?</title>
		<link>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2010/01/should-one-get-into-googles-real-time-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2010/01/should-one-get-into-googles-real-time-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Time Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seach Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google's real-time results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google’s top results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search page results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2010/01/should-one-get-into-googles-real-time-results/" title="Should one get into Google&#039;s real-time results?"></a>On 7th December of 2009, Google launched real-time search results into search pages but what do these real-time results look like? Google search page results update currently discussed topics from social network sites such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, FriendFeed, Jaiku &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2010/01/should-one-get-into-googles-real-time-results/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2010/01/should-one-get-into-googles-real-time-results/" title="Should one get into Google&#039;s real-time results?"></a><p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-548" title="google-real-time-search" src="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/google-real-time-search-150x150.jpg" alt="google-real-time-search" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p><strong>On 7<sup>th</sup> December of 2009, Google launched real-time search results into search pages but what do these real-time results look like? Google search page results update currently discussed topics from social network sites such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, FriendFeed, Jaiku and Identi.ca just as they are happening.</strong></p>
<p>How Google chooses the real-time results or finds out which posted messages are true is yet unknown. However, there are some things one can do. Google analyzes the content from blog posts, tweets etc. to verify the value and the quality of the posted message to place the real-time results and avoid anything that looks like spam. Later on the collected text will be used to update page rankings for every contributing user.<span id="more-547"></span> Google’s real-time results are a nice addition but on the other hand real-time results do not appear with all search terms and if they do other immediate results quickly replace them.  So how can high authority posters sell links in their tweets? This is yet another problematic side.</p>
<p>So should you invest your time to get into Google&#8217;s real-time results? Well that of course that depends on you but your real-time results won’t stay up for long. Therefore the number one priority is still to be listed in Google’s top results – these are the long lasting results that will truly bring targeted visitors to your website.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2010/01/should-one-get-into-googles-real-time-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>85 percent of travel companies make SEO the number one priority for 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/11/85-percent-of-travel-companies-make-seo-the-number-one-priority-for-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/11/85-percent-of-travel-companies-make-seo-the-number-one-priority-for-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multilingual marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seach Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 travel survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/11/85-percent-of-travel-companies-make-seo-the-number-one-priority-for-2010/" title="85 percent of travel companies make SEO the number one priority for 2010 "></a>According to www.travelmole.com, the second global travel survey, 85 percent of travel companies are due to increase or maintain the same online marketing budgets for 2010, which promises to be a highly competitive year in the travel industry for internet &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/11/85-percent-of-travel-companies-make-seo-the-number-one-priority-for-2010/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/11/85-percent-of-travel-companies-make-seo-the-number-one-priority-for-2010/" title="85 percent of travel companies make SEO the number one priority for 2010 "></a><p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-529" title="img-booking" src="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/img-booking-150x150.jpg" alt="img-booking" width="114" height="123" /><strong>Accor</strong><strong>ding to www.</strong><strong>travelmole.com, the second global travel survey, 85 percent of travel companies are due to increase or maintain the same online marketing budgets for 2010, which promises to be a highly competitive year in the travel industry for internet marketing. </strong></p>
<p>27 percent of the participated 227 companies including hoteliers, travel agents, tour operators and airlines expect online budgets to increase by up to 50 percent, as securing online bookings pushes for more advertising.<span id="more-527"></span>The Travel Mole study revealed that overall 54 percent of the travel companies will be increasing their budgets to promote themselves online for 2010, while only 15 percent will be investing less. 84 percent believe that the role of SEO will be more than ever, the number one priority for 2010, in order to maintain or declare company presence on the ever increasing online community.</p>
<p>Social media marketing, as well as the use of original content translated into different languages to capture a wider market, is a top priority for more than half of the companies involved in the survey.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<p><!--Session data--></p>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/11/85-percent-of-travel-companies-make-seo-the-number-one-priority-for-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you need TV? I don’t have one</title>
		<link>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/07/do-you-need-tv-i-don%e2%80%99t-have-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/07/do-you-need-tv-i-don%e2%80%99t-have-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/07/do-you-need-tv-i-don%e2%80%99t-have-one/" title="Do you need TV? I don’t have one"></a>According to IBM survey on “television sets are losing ground to the internet”, conducted in 2007, 66 percent responded spent one to four hours in front of the television versus 60 percent on the internet. That was 2007. So 2009, &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/07/do-you-need-tv-i-don%e2%80%99t-have-one/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/07/do-you-need-tv-i-don%e2%80%99t-have-one/" title="Do you need TV? I don’t have one"></a><p>According to IBM survey on “television sets are losing ground to the internet”, conducted in 2007, 66 percent responded spent one to four hours in front of the television versus 60 percent on the internet. That was 2007.</p>
<p>So 2009, television is in one corner of the arena and Internet is in the other. Who is going to be the winner?</p>
<p>I personally have not had TV over 5 years, do not miss it or use it. Among the people I know, I am not the only one. Since getting my own place my dear Internet has replaced TV, radio, books, magazines, newspapers and occasionally telephone. The amount of online resources offers every thing from broadcasts, cartoons, radio to any entertainments.</p>
<p>The power behind Internet is the choice of information. What to watch, listen, and read, when or how long as well as freedom to share my opinion about anything that is happening in the world. TV shows, music, news, chatting, working, study, reading, games anything really. <span id="more-457"></span></p>
<p>Some people may say they like TV for documentaries well go to Google video. There you can find documentaries two hours long on any thing. If you know where to look, Internet provides so much more than TV, rather than just watch somebody talking, one can actually access real resources.</p>
<p>One other thing, time spend on flicking TV channels with hope to find something interesting to watch is over for me. Watching DVDs or downloaded shows with my friends is just normal, however one day will get 32&#8243; Display monitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.optimizeyourweb.com/index.php/2009/07/do-you-need-tv-i-don%e2%80%99t-have-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

